C# - Gang Of Four - Design Patterns, Elements Of Reusable Object Oriented Software. Erich Gamma, John M. Vlissides, Ralph Johnson, Richard Helm

C# - Gang Of Four - Design Patterns, Elements Of Reusable Object Oriented Software


C.Gang.Of.Four.Design.Patterns.Elements.Of.Reusable.Object.Oriented.Software.pdf
ISBN: 0201634988,9780201634983 | 551 pages | 14 Mb


Download C# - Gang Of Four - Design Patterns, Elements Of Reusable Object Oriented Software



C# - Gang Of Four - Design Patterns, Elements Of Reusable Object Oriented Software Erich Gamma, John M. Vlissides, Ralph Johnson, Richard Helm
Publisher: Addison-Wesley Professional




The result is In designing my MPI library I embraced the object- oriented style, using a layered and modular architecture and incorporating six different common software design patterns (described by the “Gang of Four” in “Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software”). Reviewing Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software by the Gang of Four. This is regarded as the “classic” or original patterns book by the Gang of Four (also referred to as Gof). Design Patterns; Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software , by Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, John Vlissides (Addison Wesley, 1995). It's been half a year since I've acquired this book and it has taken a huge effort to go through the book. My PhD involved building a message passing library using C#; not accessing an existing MPI library from C# code but creating a brand new MPI library written entirely in pure C#. A blog on web and software development. It covers the classic "Gang of Four" software Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software by Gamma, Helm, Johnson, and Vlissides (aka The Gang of Four). Release It!: Design and Deploy Production-Ready Software by Michael Nygard. Data and Object Factory Page on the Command Pattern http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/PatternCommand.aspx. Search NET/C# as my main programming language at work the past 4 or 5 years, but this is no problem at all, as C# and Java are very similar, syntactically. How often have you seen the disclaimer, "This isn't Although it is written for Java developers, it is equally applicable to and comprehensible by C# developers.